How do we work?

^{2 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

Indigenous peoples and local communities managing tropical forests have stated there are five necessary conditions for them to continue protecting the world’s tropical forests:

1) An end to the violence, criminalization and murder of indigenous peoples
2) Recognition and enforcement of legitimate territorial rights
3) Direct access to climate finance
4) Full respect of the right to free, prior and informed consent
5) Incorporation of traditional knowledge in climate change strategies

At the climate summit in Glasgow in 2021, parties committed to end deforestation by 2030, and recognized how Indigenous Peoples and local communities are key to achieve this goal. In Glasgow, Prime Minister Støre, along with a number of other donors, pledged 1,7 billion USD to secure land and resource rights of indigenous peoples and other forest dependent communities, including by channelling more funds directly to indigenous peoples and local communities organizations and their funds for territorial management. The donors behind the pledge also committed to monitor and report on spending and cooperation with indigenous peoples and local communities’ organizations in this effort. Also in extension of the pledges made at CoP26, a number of countries committed to pursue action at political level through the high ambition coalition Forest and Climate Leaders Partnership. Norway co-leads the Action Area for Supporting Indigenous Peoples and Local Communties under this partnership Peru and Norway to advance global partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities – NICFI

NICFI STRATEGY

Beyond support to government efforts to protect Indigenous Peoples’ rights and livelihoods, NICFI works to give Indigenous Peoples and other forest dependent communities a voice in the international community, in the global climate negotiations and at the national and local level. Specifically we support:

• UN Human Rights Council resolutions to protect environmental human rights defenders.
• Programs to secure land and forest tenure rights for indigenous peoples and local communities in partner countries and beyond.
• In extension of the Norwegian Government’s policy on indigenous peoples and minorities in Norway, we work closely with the Saami Parliament and the Saami Council, to support Indigenous Peoples’ active participation in global biodiversity and climate talks
• The participation of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in national policy processes and in decisions that affect them, such as National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans and Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement
• Participation of indigenous peoples and local communities in tropical forest countries efforts to access climate finance to end deforestation.
• Donor coordination towards more direct support to indigenous peoples and local communities and efforts by tropical forest countries to scale up tenure reform and protect environmental human rights defenders more effectively.

^{3 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

While reducing forest loss is in the national interest of forest countries, international support can help them do more, faster. Reduced emissions are also a global good. Mobilizing large-scale climate finance for reduced deforestation has therefore been a key priority for NICFI since the beginning in 2008.

The concept of “REDD+” – international payments for reduced deforestation and forest degradation – was included in the UN climate agreement from 2010, and later through the “Warsaw framework for REDD+”. In 2015 it was thoroughly highlighted in the Paris Agreement. Yet so far, the international community has failed to mobilize large scale high quality carbon markets and other finance that could provide an effective incentive to forest countries. This must change.

^{4 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

Sunlight is the best disinfectant. Most forest destruction starts with a crime. Forest areas have historically been ‘white places on the map’, far from the attention of central authorities or the media. Where governments have had surveillance capacity, enforcement efforts have struggled to reach beyond the poor person with the chainsaw and reach the kingpins behind investing in the operations. Companies committed to buying deforestation-free commodities have not been able to determine who supplied their supplier. Investors and banks have lacked the tools to determine the deforestation risks of their portfolios, and to act on them.

^{5 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

Just as a consumer would not be happy having 30% of his or her food produced by slaves, consumers around the world are increasingly expecting that their products are completely free of rainforest destruction. Eliminating deforestation from commodity supply chains will require determined and consistent market signals from consumers, supermarkets and commodity traders, combined with public land use policies that enable sufficient growth in production outside of forests.

In the New York Declaration on Forest in 2014, companies, governments and civils society comitted to work together to halt deforestation.The pledge has delivered important successes such as the Amazon soy moratorium and the significant reduction in deforestation from oil palm in Indonesia. Some companies are putting pressure on suppliers to meet their goals. Overall, however, progress has been too slow.

To strengthen supply chain action, leading companies of the Consumer Goods Forum has established a dedicated “Coalition of Action” with clear short term milestones towards deforestation free production.

^{6 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

Today, it is hard to invest your savings or pensions without contributing to deforestation. With the exception of important front-runners, global finance has not taken sufficient account of the environmental damage and financial risks associated with deforestation. Even committed financiers have lacked access to credible and standardized data to be able to address deforestation risk.

Overall, forest destruction has not been understood as a material financial risk. But in a low carbon future there is no room for deforestation related emissions. A license to clear intact rainforests should be considered a ‘stranded asset’ similar to a new coal plant that would not be profitable in a policy environment aligned with the Paris Agreement.

^{7 OF 7 STRATEGIC AREAS}

Illegal logging and trade in tropical timber is one of the world´s most lucrative criminal industries. The perpetrators – typically large, trans-national criminal networks – are involved in crimes such as corruption, money laundering and tax evasion, as well as violations of the rights of indigenous and local communities. They undermine governance, rights and entire economies.

Fighting forest crime is primarily the responsibility of forest country governments, and we support their efforts directly through bilateral partnerships. However, it should also be addressed by the markets where timber and timber products are processed and sold. Increased collaboration among enforcement agencies of producer and consuming countries can enhance national efforts.

Transparency and public access to information about concessions, land ownership and financial flows are vital for bringing these crimes into the public light. Civil society plays an important role in exposing and reporting on corruption and illegalities in the forest sector.